Hi all,
been looking at a new gun, for home defense and CC. Currently have 4 favorites. All 4 are used.
1. CZ 82 in 9mm x 18 Makarov (Czek surplus)
$279, with 2 mags, both 12 rnd, and case
Pros:
All steel construction.
Simple and durable
I like the 9 x 18 round (it is between a .380 and a 9mm parabellum)
12 round magazines
very accurate, feels good in hand
rated very high for reliability
Cons:
No decocker
A little heavy
A little wide in the grip, as the mag is a double stack.
2. Bersa Thunder in .380
$280 with case and 2 7rnd mags
Pros:
Decocker
good feel
slim profile
light weight
Cons:
.380 is not as powerful a round as the 9 x 18,
Ammo costs more than the 9 x 18
Bersas have been known to have occasional feeding probs and misfires
not as accurate as the CZ 82
low mag capacity
3. FEG PA 63 Hungarian surplus in 9 x 18 mak
$280-300, comes with 4 7rnd mags and IWB holster
Pros:
Alloy frame for light weight
ideal size for CC
9 x 18 Mak
said to have good reliability
Cons:
blowback is said to be bad
I am told it's a difficult gun to shoot, and the double action trigger pull is supposed to be hard.
4. P64 (Polish military surplus) in .380
$239 comes w/ 1 6rnd mag
Pros:
All steel
very small for CC
very reliable
small mag
Cons:
small mag
.380
don't like the sights as much as the other 3.
So, those are the 4 I am looking at. If weight weren't an issue, I would grab the CZ 82 in a heart beat.
I have shot .380, even a Bersa .380, but I have never shot a 9 x 18 Mak. The ballistics/energy seem to be just a tad better than the .380, and as I mentioned, the ammo is cheaper. You can't even find 9 x 19 right now, .380 is around, but is expensive. I can get boxes of 50 rnd 95grn FMJ rounds in 9 x 18 at my local gun store for $14/box, or get the good JHP stuff for just under $20/box.
Any feedback from anyone who has or has shot/owned any of these guns is much appreciated!
been looking at a new gun, for home defense and CC. Currently have 4 favorites. All 4 are used.
1. CZ 82 in 9mm x 18 Makarov (Czek surplus)
$279, with 2 mags, both 12 rnd, and case
Pros:
All steel construction.
Simple and durable
I like the 9 x 18 round (it is between a .380 and a 9mm parabellum)
12 round magazines
very accurate, feels good in hand
rated very high for reliability
Cons:
No decocker
A little heavy
A little wide in the grip, as the mag is a double stack.
2. Bersa Thunder in .380
$280 with case and 2 7rnd mags
Pros:
Decocker
good feel
slim profile
light weight
Cons:
.380 is not as powerful a round as the 9 x 18,
Ammo costs more than the 9 x 18
Bersas have been known to have occasional feeding probs and misfires
not as accurate as the CZ 82
low mag capacity
3. FEG PA 63 Hungarian surplus in 9 x 18 mak
$280-300, comes with 4 7rnd mags and IWB holster
Pros:
Alloy frame for light weight
ideal size for CC
9 x 18 Mak
said to have good reliability
Cons:
blowback is said to be bad
I am told it's a difficult gun to shoot, and the double action trigger pull is supposed to be hard.
4. P64 (Polish military surplus) in .380
$239 comes w/ 1 6rnd mag
Pros:
All steel
very small for CC
very reliable
small mag
Cons:
small mag
.380
don't like the sights as much as the other 3.
So, those are the 4 I am looking at. If weight weren't an issue, I would grab the CZ 82 in a heart beat.
I have shot .380, even a Bersa .380, but I have never shot a 9 x 18 Mak. The ballistics/energy seem to be just a tad better than the .380, and as I mentioned, the ammo is cheaper. You can't even find 9 x 19 right now, .380 is around, but is expensive. I can get boxes of 50 rnd 95grn FMJ rounds in 9 x 18 at my local gun store for $14/box, or get the good JHP stuff for just under $20/box.
Any feedback from anyone who has or has shot/owned any of these guns is much appreciated!