Barack just joined the NRA

#6
Because the only logical answer to too many gun problems, is more guns.
I'd bet money you wish you were holding that "one more gun" if a perp breaks in your home and threatens to harm you and your family....just sayin'.
This isn't a utopian world folks, the sooner we realize the bad guys dont care about gun laws and protect ourselves the sooner we step from becoming victims to a prepared society.
 
#7
I'd bet money you wish you were holding that "one more gun" if a perp breaks in your home and threatens to harm you and your family....just sayin'.
This isn't a utopian world folks, the sooner we realize the bad guys dont care about gun laws and protect ourselves the sooner we step from becoming victims to a prepared society.
are you in my head ? if so ya shouldnt be its dark and scary in there :laugh:

ya it sucks that we live in a world where we need to carry a gun to keep us safe . but if we give them up the we just put ourselfs in more danger from the people who wont give them up .
 
#8
are you in my head ? if so ya shouldnt be its dark and scary in there :laugh:

ya it sucks that we live in a world where we need to carry a gun to keep us safe . but if we give them up the we just put ourselfs in more danger from the people who wont give them up .
Where do you live in the old west?

No one should carry a gun in public.
Nothing wrong with owning them, but thats about as stupid is saying I shoudl back a thermonuclear weapon in case the soviets attack.

Civilized people can own nearly any sort firearm.
Provided of course they are secured from theft and used in a responsible manner.
Thats all you need.

I think this sums up difference in opinion on personal ownership and use of firearms.
And its very cheezy but Canada post paid for the spot lol.
And it probably never happened....
But Sam steel was real, and a highly decorated Vet of the Boer war.
Thats also begs the question.....
On the one hand he was known to be a reasonable and effective policeman.
On the other, he helped maintain order in a concentration camp.
Weapons on your hip do not protect your freedom in a democracy.
Only being an informed voter does....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lab6gyWsMXo

Merry Christmas.
 
#10
newoldstock, there is a huge difference in me carrying a pistol daily over me punching a button for a nuke war. gimmie a break man, damn, its ok if you dont carry, I sure hope the day never comes to you that you wish you did.
and I know next you will say "I'm x amount of years old and never needed one yet" and I'll respond with "do you wear a seatbelt when your in your car prepared for the crash that may never come, but prepared for it anyways."
Understand, this is a different world we live in, its not safe anymore and its proven daily. be ready or become a victim, either way, its ok with me, I choose to be ready, and none of your liberal babbling will get me to change my mind.
 
Last edited:

MikeBear

Active Member
#11
Put simply as possible, pure and simple:

SHEEP get slaughtered by WOLVES, and there are a LOT of wolves out there, and more all the time.

The shepard can NEVER protect every sheep he's watching over well enough to keep everyone from not being killed. The same goes for "the man".

It's been said before: "When seconds count, the police are only MINUTES away"...

Whether you carry or not, DON'T BE A COMPLETE SHEEP! Even sheep can take down a wolf if there's enough of them that want to bad enough...
 
Last edited:
#12
newoldstock, there is a huge difference in me carrying a pistol daily over me punching a button for a nuke war. gimmie a break man, damn, its ok if you dont carry, I sure hope the day never comes to you that you wish you did.
and I know next you will say "I'm x amount of years old and never needed one yet" and I'll respond with "do you wear a seatbelt when your in your car prepared for the crash that may never come, but prepared for it anyways."
Understand, this is a different world we live in, its not safe anymore and its proven daily. be ready or become a victim, either way, its ok with me, I choose to be ready, and none of your liberal pansy mindless babbling will get me to change my mind.

Think about this.
You have a gun and I do...
I suspect you have a gun and want your wallet.
May as well stay 5 steps behind you, shoot you in the back of the head and then take your wallet and your gun.
Safest way to rob you in my book....

If I suspect the probility of you having a gun is low I might just threaton you, take your wallet and let you live.

You may try and wrestle me.
I am probably younger and faster and one or both of use die.

Or you get lucky and kill me first.

Lots of ifs there.
I just as soon not see anyone carry a gun around me unless they are police.

And don't call me a liberal.
You have no idea what I am.
You realy want to get into politics I am a socialist ( I make a distinction ).
I am the kind of solcialist that thinks its quite reasonable to own guns and protect your family within the confines of your home.
I just think its pointless to pack a pistol in public, and maybe even more dangerous.

A seatbelt is not a hand gun.
My world more or less exactly the same as it was last week or last month.
Its safer today than it was ten years ago, and safer still than it was the thirty previous before.
If your place of residence is that dangerous, you need to move.

I stand a better chance of being hit by car.
I am more likely to be crushed in an accident at work.
I will probably die of lung cancer before lead poisoning.....

Why are you scared and who is trying to scare you?
Are you man or a frightened child?
If your a man hold your head up high and step out into the real world of uncertainty where cars and lung cancer and giant slabs of rock are more likely to kill you.
 
Last edited:

Oldsalt

Well-Known Member
#13
Because the only logical answer to too many gun problems, is more guns.

And better ones like a .50 cal. M50 Sniper Rifle. My friend seems to like mine and wants to take it home!

You are RIGHT ON Bro! Now that the ghetto dwellers have shown a marked propensity for robbing and killing to support their dope habits it is necessary to out gun them.
 
Last edited:
#14
I agree, you better sneak up behind me and shoot me. otherwise it might not bode so well for ya.

Its not my place of residence, heck, I dont even have a lock on my front door, I live in the country... but it is the places I have to go to sometimes, places like the city of houston etc etc,....I do practice and intend to defend myself and loved ones appropriately if need be, I hope I never ever have to, but Lord knows, I am ready if I have to, simple.
you compare a licensed gun owner to a person thats ready to hit the nuke button but you dont think the seatbelt analogy is appropriate?
I will make sure all the crooks get the memo to not commit crimes anywhere but the home so your logic will be effective.
why is it, when I choose to exercise my second amendment rights to protect myself and family, liberals like yourself always say why are you scared? baby... little boy... etc etc etc. It doesnt bother me the name callings, it doesnt bother me that you choose to be a helpless sheep in life, your choice and I wish you well.
 
Last edited:

Oldsalt

Well-Known Member
#15
Why are you scared and who is trying to scare you?
Are you man or a frightened child?
If your a man hold your head up high and step out into the real world of uncertainty where cars and lung cancer and giant slabs of rock are more likely to kill you.



BRAVO! Spoken like a true "Canadian Born and Raised in Canada! Nothing less could be expected from a subject of the Crown that was born decades after all gun ownership in their country was in effect banned. Your training by dent of your federally owned TV and radio has obviously did a superb job

I know the following will be exceedingly difficult for a citizen of an "enlightened country" to internalize. It's crazy, crazy to anyone brought up on the propaganda you were subjected to in your formative years, but ya see there is a thing called "The Constitution Of the United States". Come on! Don't let your eyes glaze over for the hundredth time when you saw those "right wing words"! To proceed; it was written to protect the rights of the people living in the country to the south of you. It was our "founding document" that formed the country. One of the things that is embodied in it is the right to KEEP and BEAR arms.

Ya, I know. You folks that have lost such rights and, further, are bombarded daily by anti-gun garbage by your government controlled media will find it difficult [or, so far, in your case 'impossible] to understand why Americans don't like the idea of losing another guaranteed right. Some of us are even more sensitive regarding the subject; we tend to take umbrage when foreigners voice opinions, obviously based on laws and social attitudes in there own country, that support the idea we should be disarmed like them.
 
Last edited:
#16
It still astonishes me how many people think the right to bear arms is there to protect us from bad guys, it's there to protect us from our government. (3) years after Germany outlawed guns owned by citizen's, they started rounding up it's citizens.
Those who can not remember history are condemned to repeat it.
 
#17
True, it was written to protect us from governement and to aid it when required. In current context, it applies much more to protection. Can the Govt get much worse?
 
Top